55 Music Concourse Dr.
Golden Gate Park
San Francisco CA
94118
415.379.8000
Regular Hours:

Daily

9:30 am – 5:00 pm

Sunday

11:00 am – 5:00 pm
Members' Hours:

Tuesday

8:30 – 9:30 am

Sunday

10:00 – 11:00 am
Closures
Notices

Please note: The Academy will be closing at 3:00 pm on 10/24 (final entry at 2:00 pm). We apologize for any inconvenience.

Parking and traffic in Golden Gate Park will be congested the weekend of Oct. 3–5. Save $3 on Academy admission when you take public transportation.

Climate Change 

October 13, 2009

Yes, it’s getting cooler…

roop_dsc_0030

Good, did that get your attention? I’m interrupting my “Six Degrees” series of posts to address a topic that has been in the news recently. That topic is the supposedly new observation or conclusion that the planet is cooling, in opposition to the warming trend. For example, the BBC ran this piece entitled “What happened to global warming?”. The answer, in a nutshell, is NOTHING. The article has stirred up quite a bit of argument and discussion between proponents and skeptics of global warming. So what’s all the fuss about? I’ll try to explain. But first, let me be blunt: the natural world does not give a fig about our opinions, whether we support (“believe in”) or deny (see here) human-caused global warming.

Okay, so what is this about? The Earth’s climate is a dynamic system, meaning that it evolves over time, and at any given time may be considered to be in a particular state. One of the major drivers or controllers of climate is the world ocean, primarily because the ocean is the planet’s major heat sink. This is the result of water’s high heat capacity. To understand this, think about a pot of water boiling on your stove. You watch it, and it just sits there. Now suppose one stuck one’s hand into the flame (Readers: Do not try this at home). Gee, your hand heated up pretty quickly! Not so with the water. But eventually, the water absorbs enough heat energy to begin it’s transition from the liquid state to a vapour state; that is, it boils. It takes a lot of energy to change the temperature of water. That’s just one wonderful property due to water’s fantastic molecular structure. The world ocean covers 70% of the planet’s surface, and it’s movement is the global movement of heat.

The oceans are dynamic; they flow, they mix, they churn. One could say that our understanding of long-term ocean dynamics is still very incomplete, but we do know that there is long-term variability in the states of the world ocean, and hence in climate. Perhaps the most familiar manifestation of this is the El Niño-La Niña quasi-cycle. Another is the less familiar Pacific Decadal Oscillation, or PDO. These phenomena represent natural variability in the ocean’s circulation. The variation translates into climate variability. We’ve seen these cycles operate through the 20th century. The century began a bit on the warm side, but cooled globally, on average, from the 1940′s through 1970′s. The variation is caused by the ocean sloshing back and forth. Now the sloshing is causing cooling once more.

THIS IS UNRELATED TO THE TREND OF HUMAN-DRIVEN GLOBAL WARMING. Let me say this again: This is not a reversal, nor is it refutation of anthropogenic global warming. How do I know this? Science folks. The media really should speak with the scientists doing the research, rather than sensationalizing and immediately seeking the nonsensical sound bytes of dwellers on the fringe. The cooling has been noted for some time (I blogged about it almost a year ago!), and we know that it is being driven by the PDO. Now here’s the cool part. We can tease apart this natural variability and other influences, so-called external forcings. This means that we can look at global temperature, and ask how much of it is due to the ocean driver, and how much to external factors. Should I tell you what the answer is? Can you guess? IT’S STILL WARMING. Overlain on the natural variability of our climate is a clear upward trend through the 20th century.

Don’t believe me? Show your friendly neighbourhood scientists a little love and read one of the original studies here. ‘Nuf said.


Filed under: Climate Change — Peter @ 6:28 pm

5 Comments »

  1. Is that study available other than behind a paywall?

    Comment by Robert Ellison — October 14, 2009 @ 8:54 am

  2. “The media really should speak with the scientists doing the research, rather than sensationalizing and immediately seeking the nonsensical sound bytes of dwellers on the fringe.” LOL! How true! I totally agree. I can only hope that they heed your advice. What a crazy circus of conjecture our poor public is barraged with every hour. Thanks for speaking out. Right On!

    Comment by Californiality — October 16, 2009 @ 2:44 pm

  3. I’m not sure; I’ll check. You can, however, request a copy from the authors. I’m sure that they would be happy to oblige! Unfortunately, we (scientists) do not control access to publications unless the publisher has an open access policy.

    Comment by Peter — October 16, 2009 @ 7:22 pm

  4. “Nonsensical soundbites of dwellers on the fringe” you say. That’s just what the Southern Baptists say about those who cleave to the heresies of Darwin. I am a scientist and attorney, but I’m lost in the mumbo jumbo. So let me get this straight. We now have global cooling (just like the the 70s) because the oceans are just sloshing around and sometimes the cold water is on top and sometimes it’s not. Sorry, but the Wizard of Oz was more credible. In any case, the arrogance and hubris in your comment is palpable, and it is why I don’t trust you or any of your co-religionists and associated opportunists in Washington who are beavering to pick my pockets.

    Comment by max hensley — November 12, 2009 @ 10:27 pm

  5. Gee Max, you are a scientist? Darwinian heresy? Really? What type of scientist are you? What have you studied? Sorry that you’re lost in the mumbo jumbo; perhaps a bit more effort on your part would clear things up for you. I don’t ask for your trust; that is of no importance to the problem at hand. And no, you did not get it straight. If you’d like to understand ocean circulation in general, and the PDO’s effects on climate more specifically, then do a bit of work and critical thinking. There’s no substitute for those. Finally, do not confuse exasperation and irritation for hubris and arrogance. Trust me here: your mistaken concern for your pockets is your problem, and yours only. Global warming is a bit more important. Soundbites indeed.

    Comment by Peter — November 15, 2009 @ 9:33 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Academy Blogroll