<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Warming Confirmation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/global-warming-confirmation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/global-warming-confirmation/555872/</link>
	<description>Breaking science news from around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Record-Breaking Climate &#171; Earth &#171; Science Today: Breaking science news from around the world</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/global-warming-confirmation/555872/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Record-Breaking Climate &#171; Earth &#171; Science Today: Breaking science news from around the world</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=5872#comment-844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for the New York Times declaring himself a converted skeptic on climate change. You’ll recall a piece we wrote on his research confirming global warming last fall, but in the Times article he states [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the New York Times declaring himself a converted skeptic on climate change. You’ll recall a piece we wrote on his research confirming global warming last fall, but in the Times article he states [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/global-warming-confirmation/555872/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=5872#comment-555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who are the &quot;good guys&quot;?   from what I have read from, Dr Mullers own articles, is that he never was a skeptic about global warming.  he believes in i.  However, since he seems to be a rational man and a true scientist, he was concerned about the science and believed that even &quot;skeptics&quot; should be listened to ... that their concerns should be addressed rather than vilify and condemn them outright.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;contrary to what this article states or the quoted articles, the study was only regarding the data of the ground based temperatures and it does NOT confirm the infamous hocky stick since it only relates to the temp data (going back to the 1800s and not proxi data.  it does not address wether there was a medival warming period.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;additionally, he does not make reference to mans part in the equation. This study is only to veryify the data and answer concerns about the reliability.  all it shows is that yes, we have warmed since the 1800s&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are the &#8220;good guys&#8221;?   from what I have read from, Dr Mullers own articles, is that he never was a skeptic about global warming.  he believes in i.  However, since he seems to be a rational man and a true scientist, he was concerned about the science and believed that even &#8220;skeptics&#8221; should be listened to &#8230; that their concerns should be addressed rather than vilify and condemn them outright.</p>
<p>contrary to what this article states or the quoted articles, the study was only regarding the data of the ground based temperatures and it does NOT confirm the infamous hocky stick since it only relates to the temp data (going back to the 1800s and not proxi data.  it does not address wether there was a medival warming period.</p>
<p>additionally, he does not make reference to mans part in the equation. This study is only to veryify the data and answer concerns about the reliability.  all it shows is that yes, we have warmed since the 1800s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>