Can birds read? While a new study provides evidence of avian intelligence, no, our feathered friends aren’t literate (as far as we know).

Canadian researchers, working in France, have found that birds foraging on roads and highways vary the amount of time they take to leave the asphalt when they see a car approaching. And it appears to depend on the posted speed limit.

During Pierre Legagneux’s commute he noticed that birds let him drive closer if he was traveling on a slower road. Using a modern, hi-tech tool—a stopwatch—the scientist monitored the birds’ “flight initiation distances” (FIDs) from the safety of his speeding car.

“FID is basically the distance that the car is from the bird when the bird takes off,” explains Academy bird expert Jack Dumbacher. “When a car is moving slowly, the bird can wait until the car gets pretty close, but when the car is moving fast, it has to begin taking off when the car is still very far away—just to make sure that it can avoid being hit. He was able to measure this pretty easily on his commute by multiplying his speed by the time it took to reach the bird.”

Over a year’s time, Legagneaux measured the FIDs of 134 birds from 21 different species, including many crows (Corvus corone), sparrows (Passer domesticus), blackbirds (Turdus merula) and unidentified songbirds.

And what he found was astonishing! His actual speed had nothing to do with the FID. But the posted speed limit did. The birds’ FID was consistently farther away for faster roads. For roads with a 20 kilometers per hour posted sign, the birds’ FID was 10 meters; 90km/hour signs, 25 meters; and 110km/hour, 75 meters.

“The authors aren’t exactly sure how the birds know, but it appears to have more to do with the AREA than with the oncoming car,” Dumbacher says. “The birds are not assessing the speed of the car, but what speed they THINK the car OUGHT to be going in that area.  And thus, the best predictor in the models was the actual posted speed limit.

“The method is simple and elegant—and something that he was able to do while commuting and paying attention to traffic. (Apparently there aren’t laws against operating a stopwatch while driving in Europe.),” Dumbacher continues.  “All he had to do was jot down 1) his speed, 2) the speed limit, and 3) the time it took to reach the spot where the bird took off.  From his citations, it looks like something like this has been studied before, but this is a cool and interesting article—something that a high school student could do for her science fair project (if she were old enough to drive…).”

The research is published in Biology Letters.

Crow image: Mostly Dans/Flickr

Evolution takes time. Or does it?

Evolution can happen rapidly—it all depends upon how strong selection is and how much genetic variation there is in the trait being selected.  We tend to look at fossil bones, for example those along the horse lineage, and it seems like only a few millimeters of length are added per hundreds of thousands of years.  But in fact, these traits can vary quite a bit—even within populations—and if you have lots of individuals and lots of points in time, sometimes you can see really noticeable changes in short times.  The classic examples are Darwin’s Finches, that can significantly evolve larger or smaller bills during times of great stress.

That’s the Academy’s bird expert Jack Dumbacher. I asked him about a paper published this week in Current Biology about birds evolving shorter wings over a time-span of a mere thirty years. The evolutionary advantage? To avoid becoming roadkill.

In the US alone, an estimated 80 million birds are killed each year by cars. But the paper’s two authors, Nebraska researchers Charles and Mary Brown, noticed that fewer of the swallows they’ve studied for the past 30 years were becoming roadkill. This finding was surprising, since there are more cars on the road now than in the 1980s, and more of the swallows make their homes near the highways.

The researchers recently collected hundreds of dead cliff swallows from roadways, railroad tracks and other nesting areas, and noticed that “there were fewer road kills, and the birds found dead along highways had longer wing spans,” Charles Brown says. “I wanted to know if there was selection for particular characteristics in those dead birds.”

So he and his colleagues began a retrospective analysis, measuring the specimens in his 30-year collection. According to ScienceNOW:

The birds that were being killed, further analysis revealed, weren’t representative of the rest of the population. On average, they had longer wings. In 2012, for example, the average cliff swallow in the population had a 106-millimeter wingspan, whereas the average swallow killed on the road had a 112-millimeter wingspan.

The results suggested cliff swallows were undergoing morphological changes through natural selection.

Jack explains this adaptation. “Shorter wings—just like shorter cars – usually means a shorter turning radius. So if the birds need to make a rapid change in course, smaller wings might help facilitate this.”

The cliff swallows aren’t the first bird species to evolve quickly in response to human impacts. “One of my favorite examples is bird song in human habitats,” Jack says. “Our roads and neighborhoods are full of noises—air conditioners, traffic and other machines. Some of these produce noise in certain frequencies that can drown out or obscure bird song.  Researchers here and abroad have shown that many birds have noticeably shifted their song frequencies to avoid our ‘white noise’ and be better heard in human environments.”

Jack appreciates the work of the Browns in determining these shorter wingspans. “We often drive our commute and watch this or that, and sometimes we even ask ourselves whether, ‘Hmm, sure does seem like there are fewer roadkill than last year.’  Even a simple question like this can be incredibly difficult to even verify, but then to do all of the work to find the cause of the change—that can be very difficult to do.  They clearly have that restless scientific mind that doesn’t rest until they find a solid answer…”

I guess it takes one to know one.

Image: Ingrid Taylar/Wikipedia