<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science Today &#187; cities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/tag/cities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday</link>
	<description>Breaking science news from around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lucky Birds</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/lucky-birds/5511182/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/lucky-birds/5511182/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackbirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lyrebirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[song]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=11182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The natural endowments of birds vary in so many ways!]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>By Molly Michelson</strong></span></p>
<p>Just like humans, some birds have better luck than others. From city life to dance moves to penises, the natural endowments of birds vary in so many ways! Several recent science publications demonstrate diversity in the bird world, so we thought we’d provide a sampling for you…</p>
<p>A study last week in the <a href="http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1763/20130593"><i>Proceedings of the Royal Society B</i></a> determines that city birds keep much longer hours than their forest-dwelling brethren. Researchers studied European <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Blackbird">blackbirds</a> (<em>Turdus merula</em>) in different environments in Germany and discovered that the artificial lights and noises of the city mean the blackbirds start their activities earlier in the day and keep on going later in the evening.</p>
<p>In fact, studies in the lab revealed that the city birds’ biological clocks were sped up compared to the forest birds’. And the authors are convinced that birds aren’t the only animals affected by city life. From the abstract:</p>
<p>Urban environments can significantly modify biologically important rhythms in wild organisms.</p>
<p>City dwellers, take note!</p>
<p>Australia’s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superb_Lyrebird">superb lyrebird</a> males possess some of the most brilliant plumage in the avian world, and researchers have now determined that the feathered creature is also a brilliant song-and-dance bird. Scientists found that the birds have a distinct dance for each of four distinct songs. <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/06/superb-lyrebird-dance-moves"><i>Wired</i></a><i> </i>posted a short video of a male lyrebird strutting its stuff that you have to hear and see to believe!</p>
<p>This mating ritual demonstrates that “the coordination of independently produced repertoires of acoustic and movement signals is not a uniquely human trait,” according to a recent publication in <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982213005812"><i>Current Biology</i></a>.</p>
<p>Maybe the male lyrebirds song-and-dance routine makes up for the fact that these males have no penises. 97% of birds simply lack the organ, using an opening called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaca#Birds">cloaca</a> instead. Originally, all birds had penises, but along the evolutionary path, most birds lost them. There are theories for why the organ was no longer needed (lighter for flight, more female control over mates), but the reason is still not known.</p>
<p>However, a new study, also in <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982213005034"><i>Current Biology</i></a>, uncovers the mechanism behind the loss. Researchers compared embryos of the well-endowed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Pekin_Duck">Pekin duck</a> (it has a corkscrew penis that can grow the entire length of its body) to those of the cloaca-ed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rooster">rooster</a> and found that both embryos begin to form penises, but around day eight or nine, the roosters’ stop growing. The scientists determined that one gene, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_morphogenetic_protein_4"><i>Bmp4</i></a>, caused the rooster embryo’s penis to stop growing.</p>
<p><em></em>Carl Zimmer, writing in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/science/the-sex-life-of-birds-and-why-its-important.html"><i>New York Times</i></a>, explains why this research not only paints a bigger picture of bird evolution, but also illustrates how understanding these genetic mechanisms can help humans, too.</p>
<p><em>Superb lyrebird image: <a title="en:User:Melburnian" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Melburnian">Melburnian</a>/Wikipedia</em></p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Lyrebird-110x62.jpg" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="birds, lyrebirds, city, cities, forests, blackbirds, song, dance, cloaca, evolution" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/lucky-birds/5511182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megalopolis Explosion</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/megalopolis-explosion/558878/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/megalopolis-explosion/558878/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spanish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zuberoa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=8878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In English and Spanish. By 2030, large cities will explode, potentially blotting out natural ecosystems.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Scroll down for Spanish versión)</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>By Zuberoa Marcos</strong></span></p>
<p>While cities can reduce the impact an individual has on the environment by increasing the density and efficiency of human settlement, the cities themselves pave over nature. By 2030, hundreds of millions more people will live in cities around the world creating vast megalopolises and blotting out ecosystems.</p>
<p>According to a study published in the <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/11/1211658109"><em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em></a>, the area covered by cities may sprawl out over an additional 1.2 million square kilometers by 2030. That means the area covered by cities may triple.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.un.org/en/">United Nations</a> (UN) predicts that cities will absorb all of the world&#8217;s population growth — of around 2.3 billion people — in the next four decades.</p>
<p>Geographer <a href="http://environment.yale.edu/profile/seto/">Karen Seto</a> and her team from Yale University, authors of the study, used NASA satellite images and population and economic growth forecasts from the UN and the <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/">Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</a> (IPCC) to build a map that assigned a probability of urbanization to 25-square-kilometer blocks all over the world. The team found that wide-ranging urbanization will take place in eastern China and tropical Africa.</p>
<p>Much of the expansion will occur near cities that are already gigantic, but some biodiversity hotspots are in danger of being swallowed by the concrete. For example, the urbanization of the tropical Guinean forests of West Africa may devour 6.8% of the regions&#8217; hotspot. The Western Ghats region of India, the highland forests of eastern Africa, and the ecosystem of Sri Lanka are other hotspots that are likely to lose ground.</p>
<p>Seto told <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/how-future-urban-sprawl-maps-out-1.11426#/b1"><em>Nature News</em></a> the map could be used to guide conservation policies helping policy-makers shape the next generation of urban infrastructure while protecting biodiversity rich areas.</p>
<p>Other experts, such as <a href="http://www.gerhard-k-heilig.com/">Gerhard Heilig</a>, chief of the United Nations&#8217; Estimates in Population Division, told <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/how-future-urban-sprawl-maps-out-1.11426#/b1"><em>Nature</em></a><em> </em>that the map itself is important because it may be the first global-scale attempt to predict the environmental impact of urbanization.   But, it is incomplete. It does not consider how those future cities will be constructed, the spatial arrangement of housing, infrastructure and green space, all factors that affect the environmental footprint of an urban area.</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>Zuberoa Marcos is a former biologist and current science writer based in Barcelona. She writes articles regularly for <em>Science Today</em>.</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Explosión de megalópolis</strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>Por Zuberoa Marcos</strong></span></p>
<p>Las ciudades, al ser lugares de asentamiento humano muy densos, pueden reducir el impacto que un individuo tiene sobre el medioambiente. Pero, al mismo tiempo, las urbes son una amenaza para la naturaleza. En 2030, cientos de millones de personas más vivirán en megalópolis que acabarán con algunos de los ecosistemas actuales.</p>
<p>Según un estudio publicado en <em><a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/11/1211658109">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</a></em>, el área cubierta por las ciudades va a aumentar en 1,2 millones de kilómetros cuadrados de aquí al 2030. Esto significa que el área ocupada por las urbes puede llegar a triplicarse en las próximas décadas.</p>
<p>Las <a href="http://www.un.org/es/">Naciones Unidas</a> (ONU) predicen que las ciudades absorberán todo el crecimiento de la población mundial &#8211; alrededor de 2,3 millones de personas – previsto en las próximas cuatro décadas.</p>
<p>La geógrafa <a href="http://environment.yale.edu/profile/seto/">Karen Seto</a> y su equipo de la Universidad de Yale, autores del estudio, emplearon imágenes de satélite de la NASA y las previsiones de crecimiento económico y de la población de las ONU y del <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/home_languages_main_spanish.shtml#.UGQwtBhODZE">Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático</a> para construir un mapa que asigna una probabilidad de urbanización a parcelas de 25 kilómetros cuadrados que abarcan todo el mundo. Al analizar el mapa, el equipo encontró que el proceso de urbanización se llevará a cabo, sobre todo, en el este de China y en el África tropical.</p>
<p>Gran parte de la expansión se producirá cerca de grandes ciudades que ya existen pero algunas áreas ricas en biodiversidad corren peligro de ser engullidas por el hormigón. Es el caso de los bosques tropicales de Guinea, en el África occidental, que podrían ver mermada su extensión en un 6.8% por la urbanización. La región de Ghats en la India, los bosques de las tierras altas del este de África y Sri Lanka son otros lugares propensos a perder ecosistemas naturales.</p>
<p>Seto explicó a <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/how-future-urban-sprawl-maps-out-1.11426#/b1"><em>Nature News</em></a> que el mapa podría ser utilizado para fijar políticas de conservación, para ayudar a los responsables políticos a dar forma a la próxima generación de infraestructuras urbanas protegiendo al mismo tiempo regiones ricas en biodiversidad.</p>
<p>Otros expertos, como <a href="http://www.gerhard-k-heilig.com/">Gerhard Heilig</a>, jefe de Estimaciones de la <em>División Población de las Naciones Unidas</em>, afirmaron a <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/how-future-urban-sprawl-maps-out-1.11426#/b1"><em>Nature</em></a> que el mapa es importante porque se trata del primer intento a escala global de predecir el impacto ambiental de la urbanización, pero que es incompleto. No tiene en cuenta cómo se construirán esas ciudades del futuro, la disposición espacial de las viviendas, de las infraestructuras y de los espacio verdes, factores que también afectan a la huella ecológica de un área urbana.</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>Zuberoa Marcos es bióloga molecular y actualmente trabaja como productora de TV y periodista científica. Escribe de forma regular para Science Today.</strong></span></p>
<p><em>Image: Seto et al./PNAS</em></p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Screen-shot-2012-10-04-at-3.48.36-PM-110x62.png" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="Screen shot 2012-10-04 at 3.48.36 PM" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/megalopolis-explosion/558878/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>