<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science Today &#187; galaxies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/tag/galaxies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday</link>
	<description>Breaking science news from around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Old Problems, New Techniques</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/old-problems-new-techniques/559724/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/old-problems-new-techniques/559724/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoplanets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryan wyatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telescopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-ray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=9724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ryan Wyatt, Director of Morrison Planetarium and Science Visualization, reporting from first day of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) meeting in Long Beach, California…]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan Wyatt, Director of Morrison Planetarium and Science Visualization, reporting from first day of <a href="http://aas.org/">the American Astronomical Society (AAS)</a> meeting in Long Beach, California…</p>
<p>I’m not going to get into <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrasolar_planet">exoplanet</a> announcements such as <a href="http://www.caltech.edu/content/planets-abound">this one</a> or <a href="http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2013/pr201301.html">this one</a> from yesterday morning’s meeting (as <a href="https://twitter.com/astroengine">one attendee</a> tweeted in summary, “There’s more exoplanets than you can shake an exostick at.”). We have ten press conferences scheduled, and three of them revolve around (pun intended) exoplanet discoveries. So I’ll plan for an exoplanet wrap-up toward the end of the conference.</p>
<p>Instead, I’d like to talk about the work of a few of those spiffy space-based telescopes—yes, the ever-popular <a href="http://hubblesite.org/">Hubble Space Telescope</a>, but also <a href="http://chandra.harvard.edu/">Chandra X-Ray Observatory</a> and a new mission known as <a href="http://www.nustar.caltech.edu/">NuSTAR</a>.</p>
<p>A grand effort known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Ultra-Deep_Field">the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF)</a> has imaged the same, small, seemingly-dull part of the sky repeatedly at numerous, finely-tuned <a href="http://missionscience.nasa.gov/ems/index.html">wavelengths of light</a>, revealing distant galaxies that reside farther than just about anything we can see. Looking out into space means looking back into time, so the HUDF reveals an important epoch in the history of the Universe.</p>
<p>It turns out the Universe in its youth went through an unusual phase when most of the hydrogen in deep space was in the form of molecules, with no net electrical charge… By the time the Universe reached the age of about 800 million years, however, most of the hydrogen had become <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionization">ionized</a>, which is to say broken down into electrons and protons (both of which have electrical charge). But it takes energy to ionize hydrogen, so where did that energy come from?</p>
<p>This is the kind of puzzle that keeps astronomers busy (and employed) for decades. Since 2004, astronomers have refined and extended the HUDF observations to eke out more information about this epoch, and <a href="http://udf12.arizona.edu/">the most recent observations</a> have allowed scientists to reach some well-founded, long-sought conclusions.</p>
<p>We know that young galaxies would emit radiation that could ionize the Universe, but can they produce enough radiation to light up the “Cosmic Dawn,” as it’s sometimes called? Astronomers love to come up with more exotic theories, such as <a href="http://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/relativity-space-astronomy-and-cosmology/dark-matter/dark-matter-annihilation/">the annihilation of dark matter</a>, to explain things like this, but are such puzzling processes required?</p>
<p>Turns out they aren’t. <a href="http://www.caltech.edu/content/caltech-led-astronomers-discover-galaxies-near-cosmic-dawn">Galaxies can do the job on their own.</a> That’s not the sexiest answer, but it should ultimately feel quite satisfying: the Universe behaves in a way that we understand and can predict. But it took a remarkable amount of sleuthing to come up with this relatively mundane response.</p>
<p>First off, we tally up the galaxies we see, and we estimate how much radiation they would emit. And the first surprise? Small, faint (the researchers like to call ’em “feeble”) galaxies make a significant contribution to the total energy output, and the large, luminous can’t do the job on their own.</p>
<p>Turns out that the currently-observed population of galaxies does not produce enough radiation to ionize all that intergalactic hydrogen. Bummer. But we know that we’re not seeing all the galaxies! We can detect only the brightest ones at these great distances, and the HUDF team’s work suggests that an earlier generation of galaxies existed before the ones we’re seeing. So how can we estimate the energy contribution from what we’re not seeing directly?</p>
<p>The team of astronomers undertook the challenge of tallying the luminous galaxies versus the number of feeble galaxies, and projecting those estimates back in time. Based on HUDF and other observations from, for example, <a href="http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/">the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)</a>, we can determine when stars and galaxies started lighting up the Universe, so when the team added up all the light from all the galaxies they estimated to have existed over that time… Bingo! Just enough light energy to ionize the Universe’s hydrogen.</p>
<p>All this work actually pushed Hubble to its limits. And it promises many more discoveries from <a href="http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/">the James Webb Space Telescope</a>, due to launch in 2018, which will peer back farther in time to see earlier generations of galaxies.</p>
<p>Hubble isn’t alone out there, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_astronomy">x-ray astronomy</a> in particular benefits from having telescopes in space. Stephen S. Murray from Johns Hopkins gave a review of “50 Years of X-Ray Astronomy,” describing remarkable successes in the field. From 1962 to 1999, x-ray astronomy has experienced an increase in sensitivity of 10 billion! (And Murray noted that it took astronomers 400 years to achieve that kind of gain in optical sensitivity…) That kind of revolutionary change has led to spectacular discoveries related to some of the most exotic objects in astronomy—including black holes, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar">pulsars</a>, and supernovae.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/news/vela_pulsar.html">An impressive video from Chandra</a> shows a curlicue jet streaming from the pulsar at the center of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_Supernova_Remnant">the Vela Supernova Remnant</a>. This complex structure provides a nifty puzzle for astronomers to describe its origin.</p>
<p>And the recently-launched <a href="http://www.nustar.caltech.edu/">Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR)</a>, one of the least expensive missions ever launched by NASA, has released <a href="http://www.nustar.caltech.edu/news/99/62/NASA-s-NuSTAR-Catches-Black-Holes-in-Galaxy-Web/d,news-detail">its first images</a>. The pair of telescopes spotted two bright, energetic sources of x-rays in the galaxy IC 342—capturing black holes in the process of “feeding” (as NuSTAR team leader Fiona Harrison puts it).</p>
<p>Stay tuned for more spacy stuff the rest of the week…</p>
<p><em>NuSTAR image courtesy of <a href="http://www.nustar.caltech.edu/uploads/images/gallery/nustar13-01/nustar13-01b.jpg" target="_blank">CalTech</a></em></p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/nustar13-01b-110x62.jpg" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="nustar13-01b" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/old-problems-new-techniques/559724/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Distant Galaxy?</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/most-distant-galaxy-3/558743/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/most-distant-galaxy-3/558743/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravitational lensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=8743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astronomers have caught a glimpse of a galaxy far, far away...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astronomers have caught a glimpse of a galaxy far, far away—possibly the most distant ever observed.</p>
<p>The galaxy, dubbed with the melodic name MACS 1149-JD, was spotted using  the combined power of NASA’s <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/spitzer/main/index.html">Spitzer</a> and <a href="http://hubblesite.org/">Hubble</a> space telescopes as well as the phenomenon of <a href="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/gravitational-lensing/">gravitational lensing</a> – using the gravity of nearer massive galaxies to bend and magnify the light of more distant ones behind them, which would otherwise remain invisible.</p>
<p>Small and compact, the galaxy appears to contain the equivalent of only about 1 percent of the Milky Way’s mass. The galaxy is quite young, only about 200 million years old, but we see it far back in time, when the Universe was quite young. (Imagine looking at an old photograph of your great grandparents: an old image showing a perhaps quite young couple.)  Light from the young galaxy captured by the orbiting observatories shone forth when the 13.7-billion-year-old Universe was just 500 million years old.</p>
<p>MACS 1149-JD existed during an important era when the Universe began to emerge from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe#Dark_ages">cosmic Dark Ages</a>. During this period, the Universe went from a dark, starless expanse to a recognizable cosmos full of galaxies. The discovery of the faint, small galaxy opens up a window into the deepest, remotest periods of cosmic history.</p>
<p>“This galaxy is the most distant object we have ever observed with high confidence,” says <a href="http://physics-astronomy.jhu.edu/people/res_staff/zheng_wei.html">Wei Zheng</a>, lead researcher on a paper appearing in <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v489/n7416/full/nature11446.html"><em>Nature</em></a><em> </em>this week. “Future work involving this galaxy—as well as others like it that we hope to find—will allow us to study the universe&#8217;s earliest objects and how the Dark Ages ended.”</p>
<p>According to leading cosmological theories, the first galaxies should have started out tiny like MACS 1149-JD. They then progressively merged, eventually accumulating into the sizable galaxies of the more modern universe.</p>
<p>These first galaxies likely played the dominant role in the “epoch of reionization,” the event that signaled the demise of the universe&#8217;s dark ages. This epoch began about 400,000 years after the <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-powered-the-big-bang/">Big Bang</a> when neutral hydrogen gas formed from cooling particles. The first luminous stars and their host galaxies emerged a few hundred million years later. The energy released by these earliest galaxies is thought to have caused the neutral hydrogen strewn throughout the Universe to ionize, or lose an electron, a state that the gas has remained in since that time.</p>
<p>Astronomers plan to study the rise of the first stars and galaxies and the epoch of reionization with the successor to both Hubble and Spitzer, NASA&#8217;s <a href="http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/">James Webb Telescope</a>, which is scheduled for launch in 2018. The newly described distant galaxy likely will be a prime target.</p>
<p><em>Image: </em><em>NASA/ESA/STScI/JHU</em><em> </em></p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/DistantGalaxy-110x62.jpg" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="DistantGalaxy" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/most-distant-galaxy-3/558743/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Distant Galaxy</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/most-distant-galaxy-2/553657/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/most-distant-galaxy-2/553657/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big bang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=3657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hubble Space Telescope has spotted a distant galaxy, 13.2 billion years in the past.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://hubblesite.org/">Hubble Space Telescope</a> once again proves itself a heck of a time machine. How does it see back in time? Because light travels at a finite speed (fast, after all, but not infinitely fast): the farther away you look, the farther back in time you see.</p>
<p>UC Santa Cruz researchers, using Hubble’s powerful Wide Field Planetary Camera 3, have looked 13.2 billion years into the past, discovering a small, compact galaxy of blue stars that existed only 480 million years after the Big Bang.</p>
<p>Creatively named UDFj-39546284, it ranks as the most distant galaxy yet observed. And it is pretty small by galaxy standards—over one hundred such mini-galaxies would fit inside our Milky Way.</p>
<p>Although individual stars can’t be resolved by Hubble, evidence suggests that this is a compact galaxy of hot stars that first started to form 100 to 200 million years earlier in a pocket of dark matter.</p>
<p>How do scientists find these distant, <a href="../infant-galaxies/">infant galaxies</a>? According to <a href="http://www.universetoday.com/82855/long-ago-in-a-galaxy-far-far-away/"><em>Universe Today</em></a>,</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Astronomers gauge the distance of an object from its redshift, a measure of how much the expansion of space has stretched the light from an object to longer (“redder”) wavelengths.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v469/n7331/full/nature09717.html" target="_blank"><em>Nature</em></a> published the paper describing UDFj-39546284 last week. But astronomers calculate a 20% chance that the distant light is not a galaxy. It will take the pricey <a href="http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/">James Webb Telescope</a> to confirm its galactic standing. Webb’s infrared vision should provide <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrometer">spectroscopic</a> measurements that can confirm the tremendous distance of the reported object. For now, UDFj-39546284 will have to wait—the telescope won’t launch for at least another three years. But heck, what’s three years compared to 13.2 billion?</p>
<p><em>Image credit: <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/">NASA</a>, <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/">ESA</a>,  G. Illingworth (University of California, Santa Cruz), R. Bouwens  (University of California, Santa Cruz, and Leiden University), and the  HUDF09 Team</em></p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/hs-2011-05-a-web-110x62.jpg" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="hs-2011-05-a-web" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/most-distant-galaxy-2/553657/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gravitational Lensing</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/gravitational-lensing/55454/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/gravitational-lensing/55454/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravitational lensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wmap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you size-up galaxies you can't see? Stanford scientists are using gravitational lensing to measure the distance, age and size of galaxies far, far away.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exciting <a href="http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0004-637X/711/1/201/">news</a> out of Stanford this week. Researchers are able to measure the size and age of distant galaxies through a technique called <a href="http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/grav_lens.html">gravitational lensing</a>.</p>
<p>Here’s how it works: When a large nearby object, such as a galaxy, blocks a distant object, such as another galaxy, gravity from the nearby object causes light to detour around it. But instead of taking a single path, light bends around the object sometimes doubling, sometimes quadrupling, sometimes creating an entire ring of light around the nearby galaxy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slac.stanford.edu/%7Epjm/">Astrophysicist Phil Marshall</a> explains it quite well using a birthday candle and wine glass stem <a href="http://media.slac.stanford.edu/video/2010/marshall_lensing/marshall_lensing_360.mov">here</a>.</p>
<p>Using the <a href="http://hubblesite.org/">Hubble Space Telescope</a> and <a href="http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/">WMAP</a> data, the Stanford team could measure the distances light traveled from a bright, active galaxy to the earth along different paths. For example, if the light quadrupled around the nearby object, the scientists could measure it four times, along four separate paths.</p>
<p>Marshall likens it to four cars taking four different routes between places on opposite sides of a large city, such as Stanford University to <a href="http://www.ucolick.org/public/visitors.html#snow">Lick Observatory</a>, through or around San Jose. And like automobiles facing traffic snarls, light can encounter delays, too.</p>
<p>By understanding the time it took to travel along each path and the effective speeds involved, researchers could infer not just how far away the galaxy lies but also the overall scale of the universe and some details of its expansion.</p>
<p>Using light bent by gravity, astronomers can measure the Universe—a yardstick billions of light years in length!</p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/SLAC-110x62.jpg" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="SLAC" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/gravitational-lensing/55454/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.slac.stanford.edu/video/2010/marshall_lensing/marshall_lensing_360.mov" length="13151884" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Infant Galaxies</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/infant-galaxies/55281/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/infant-galaxies/55281/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hubble's latest image shows 13 billion-year-old infant (and still forming) galaxies. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hubble&#8217;s latest image shows 13 billion-year-old infant (and still forming) galaxies.</p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hubble-110x62.jpg" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="hubble" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/infant-galaxies/55281/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>