<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science Today &#187; kansas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/tag/kansas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday</link>
	<description>Breaking science news from around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hunter or Scavenger?</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/hunter-or-scavenger/5511571/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/hunter-or-scavenger/5511571/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dinosaurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hadrosaur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hell creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paleontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scavenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triceratops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyrannosaurus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=11571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does T. rex have to choose?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>By Molly Michelson</strong></span></p>
<p>T.<i> rex</i>—hunter or scavenger? In this day and age of social freedoms, why not choose both? Because studying dinosaurs, especially fierce, glamorous ones like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrannosaurus"><i>Tyrannosaurus rex</i></a>, leads to fame and—well, if not fortune, then at least <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrannosaurus_in_popular_culture">movie deals</a>.</p>
<p>A study published this week in the <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/07/10/1216534110.abstract"><i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</i></a> determines, due to dental data, that <i>T. rex </i>was definitely a hunter.</p>
<p>In the Hell Creek Formation of South Dakota, researchers discovered a fossilized spine of a plant-eating <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadrosaurid">hadrosaur</a> that had an odd bone growth. Examining the fossil with a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_computed_tomography">CT scan</a>, the researchers found a tooth—belonging to a <i>T. rex</i>—within the bone. In fact, the bone had grown around the tooth.</p>
<p>“Lo and behold, the tooth plotted out just exactly with <i>T. rex</i>—the only known large theropod from the Hell Creek formation,” exclaims study author <a href="http://vertebratepaleontology.biodiversity.ku.edu/people">David Burnham</a> of the University of Kansas. “We knew we had a <i>T. rex </i>tooth in the tail of a hadrosaur. Better yet, we knew the hadrosaur got away because the bone had begun to heal. Quite possibly it was being pursued by the <i>T. rex</i> when it was bitten. It was going in the right direction—away. The hadrosaur escaped by some stroke of luck.”</p>
<p><i>T. rex</i> teeth had previously been found in the fossilized bones of a young <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceratopsia">ceratopsian</a> (<i>Triceratops</i> or one of its kin), but there was no evidence to conclude whether the ceratopsian was alive or dead when the <i>T. rex</i> made a snack of it. The hadrosaur’s escape provides evidence that <i>T. rex</i> was a dangerous, if not always accurate, predator, according to the study’s authors.</p>
<p>Because <i>T. rex</i> regularly shed its teeth, the dinosaur went away hungry, but otherwise no worse for the encounter. It would have grown a new tooth to replace the one left behind in the hadrosaur’s tail. This could have been a typical example of <i>T. rex</i>’s hunting efforts, even if it didn’t result in a meal.</p>
<p>But the story doesn’t end there. Just because you hunt doesn’t mean that’s how you find all your meals, and most scientists agree that <i>T. rex</i> was likely an opportunistic scavenger, too. In fact, researchers and <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2011/03/tyrannosaurus-hyena-of-the-cretaceous/">science writers</a> that focus on dinosaurs are tired of the either-or question. “Whether or not <i>T. rex</i> hunted is the most-asked question I get at talks and on the radio. And that makes me sad,” tweeted <a href="http://brianswitek.com/">Brian Switek</a> Monday in response to this study. There are so many more exciting questions in the field, posted paleontologist John Hutchinson, in his <a href="http://whatsinjohnsfreezer.com/2013/07/15/trex_scavenger_stfu/">blog response</a> to the publication.</p>
<p>So we’ll put it to rest here… <i>T. rex</i>: hunter <b>and </b>scavenger.</p>
<p><em>Illustration by Robert DePalma II</em></p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/huntingTrex-110x62.jpg" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="tyrannosaurus, rex, kansas, hell creek, hadrosaur, triceratops, dinosaurs, fossil, tooth, CT scan, paleontology, hunter, scavenger" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/hunter-or-scavenger/5511571/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>