<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science Today &#187; wormholes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/tag/wormholes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday</link>
	<description>Breaking science news from around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Science in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/science-in-2010/553396/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/science-in-2010/553396/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bedbugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoplanets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eyjafjallajökull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falcon 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gulf of mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jupiter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kepler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosquitoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiverse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neanderthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uc berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wormholes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=3396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 was a roller coaster year for science news—think exoplanets, synthetic-life, arsenic-eating bacteria (or not!), earthquakes, volcanoes and of course, the Gulf oil spill.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 was a year for exciting science news—think exoplanets, synthetic-life, arsenic-eating bacteria (or not!), earthquakes, volcanoes and of course, the Gulf oil spill. Many science news sites have their 2010 best lists posted—here are some of the highlights…</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>Earth</strong></span></p>
<p>The Gulf oil spill—the number of gallons spilled and the controversy surrounding <a href="../?s=oil+spill">the damage</a> seems to top many lists this year. <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/specials/2010/index.html"><em>Nature</em></a><em> </em>even named Jane Lubchenco, head of NOAA, its newsmaker of the year for how she handled the crisis.</p>
<p>Natural disasters often took the front page in 2010 with the <a href="../seismic-hazards-in-haiti/">Haitian earthquake</a> and the <a href="../volcanic-ash-2/">eruption of Eyjafjallajökull</a> topping many lists. The hard-to-pronounce Icelandic volcano also made many of the best science <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101220/full/4681018a.html">images</a> of the year lists.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.discovery.com/earth/earth-environment-green-2010-101228.html"><em>Discovery</em>News</a> ends the year on a positive note with “How Humans Helped the Earth in 2010,” a slide show with text concerning recent strides in alternative energy, species and habitat conservation efforts and individual efforts to go green (electric cars, <a href="../cool-roofs/">white roofs</a> and saving energy).</p>
<p>For more environmental news of the year, <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2010/12/2010-review-the-year-in-enviro.html"><em>New Scientist</em></a>’s Short Sharp Science has a great review and the <a href="http://blog.nature.org/2010/12/best-and-worst-environmental-moments-of-2010-2/">Nature Conservancy</a> has a best/worst list on its site.</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>Life</strong></span></p>
<p>Teeny, modified life stole the spotlight this year—the J. Craig Venter Institute’s so-called “<a href="../synthetic-cell/">synthetic cell</a>” and <a href="../arsenic-and-old-gfaj-1/">GFAJ-1</a>—the bacteria that incorporates arsenic into its DNA—or so NASA scientists claimed.  Science writer Carl Zimmer discredited the arsenic bacteria paper on <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2276919/"><em>Slate</em></a>; NASA author Felisa Wolfe-Simon defended herself in <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6012/1734.full"><em>Science</em></a>. Fun stuff!</p>
<p>The spread of pesky <a href="../bedbugs-media-darlings/">bedbugs</a> was number six in <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/photos/100-top-science-stories-of-2010"><em>Discover</em></a>’s “Top 100 Science Stories of 2010.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/news/specials/2010/reader_topten.html"><em>Nature</em></a>’s great article this past summer on <a href="../mosquito-eradication/">eradicating mosquitoes</a> was among its readers’ top choices of the year.</p>
<p>Looking for something a little bigger and less controversial? <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/gallery/zoologger-best-of-2010"><em>New Scientist</em></a><em> </em>has “The coolest animals of 2010,” which includes a scorpion-eating bat and a fly thought to be extinct for over 160 years!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/2010/12/28/132243863/2010-a-good-year-for-neanderthals-and-dna">NPR</a> found it was a very good year for Neanderthals—their genome was sequenced, <a href="../brains-on-the-brain/">brain examined</a> and <a href="../neanderthal-diet/">diet expanded</a>.</p>
<p>Remarkably, <a href="../census-of-marine-life/">the Census of Marine Life</a> tops the BP oil spill in the <a href="http://alistairdove.com/blog/2010/12/28/five-of-the-biggest-marine-science-stories-in-2010.html">Deep Type Flow</a> blog’s biggest marine science stories of the year for its sheer numbers:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">…over 500 research expeditions covering every ocean, over 2,500 scientists and the discovery of over 6,000 species new to science and published in over 2600 peer-reviewed papers.</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>Space</strong></span></p>
<p><em><a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/12/top-10-sciencenows-from-2010.html">ScienceNow</a></em>’s most popular story of all time, not just 2010, was “<a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/04/does-our-universe-live-inside-a-.html">Does Our Universe Live Inside a Wormhole?</a>” A wonderful theory that we also <a href="../a-universe-inside-a-universe/">covered</a> last spring.</p>
<p>Exoplanets, in part thanks to the <a href="../secret-exoplanets/">Kepler</a> mission, were all over the news this year—whether it had to do with <a href="../earth-like-planets/">size</a>, <a href="../puzzling-planets/">atmosphere</a> or <a href="../keplers-new-system/">number</a> within a star system. <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2011/jan-feb/11"><em>Discover</em></a>’s interview with local exoplanet hunter (and California Academy of Sciences Fellow) Geoff Marcy made number 11(!) on their 100 top stories list.</p>
<p>A little closer to home, <a href="../jupiters-missing-belt/">Jupiter’s missing stripe</a> and Neptune’s tale of cannibalism are included in <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/gallery/most-popular-space-stories-2010"><em>New Scientist</em></a>’s most popular space stories of 2010.</p>
<p><a href="../moon-water-and-whale-poop/">Our Moon</a> and <a href="../?s=saturn+moon">Saturn’s moons</a> made news throughout the year and the top lists on <em><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/82020/the-votes-are-in-top-10-stories-of-2010/">Universe Today</a></em> and <em><a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/12/top-scientific-discoveries/">Wired</a> </em>this week.</p>
<p><em>Universe Today </em>also included <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sdo/main/index.html">SDO</a>’s new views of the sun in their top stories list. Stunning!</p>
<p><a href="http://hubblesite.org/">Hubble</a> celebrated its 20<sup>th</sup> year in space this year by taking even more beautiful images. Several are included in <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/12/14/the-top-14-astronomy-pictures-of-2010/">Bad Astronomy</a>’s “Top 14 Astronomy Pictures of 2010.”</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>Technology</strong></span></p>
<p>Electric cars and NASA’s new foray into <a href="../falcon-9-takes-off/">commercial spacecraft</a> are included in <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/slideshow.cfm?id=top-10-science-stories-of-2010"><em>Scientific American</em></a>’s top ten stories of the year.</p>
<p>The Large Hadron Collider was very <a href="../?s=lhc">busy</a> this year, and topped many lists. Another machine at CERN made <a href="../trapping-antimatter/">news</a> (and also topped <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/specials/2010/reader_topten.html"><em>Nature</em></a>’s readers’ choice list) when it was able to capture antimatter for a sixth of a second!</p>
<p>Graphene not only garnered a Nobel Prize this year, the material (and it’s potential) also made <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2010/012345/full/4681018a/slideshow/1.html?identifier=1">news</a> and <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2011/jan-feb/14">top science lists</a> of the year.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.discovery.com/earth/earth-environment-green-2010-101228.html"><em>Discovery</em>News</a> put plastics on their 2010 list—whether its finding new ways of <a href="../the-plastiki-sets-sail/">removing plastic from the oceans</a> or <a href="../plastics/">engineering smarter plastics</a>.</p>
<p>What was your favorite science story of the year? Share with us by adding it to the comment section below!</p>
<p><em>Image by Les Stone, International Bird Rescue Research Center/Wikipedia</em></p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Washing_oiled_Gannet–Close1-110x62.jpg" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="Washing_oiled_Gannet–Close" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/science-in-2010/553396/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Universe Inside a Universe?</title>
		<link>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/a-universe-inside-a-universe/55901/</link>
		<comments>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/a-universe-inside-a-universe/55901/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiverse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wormholes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/?p=901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there are several universes, are they like nesting dolls or more like swiss cheese?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the <a href="http://www.nature.com/physics/highlights/6989-2.html">size</a> of the universe blows your mind, just wait. What if our universe is just a small part of another universe? What if, in fact, there’s a <em>multiverse</em> and the multiverse is like a huge chunk of swiss cheese and <em>our </em>universe is just <em>one</em> of the holes? Is there smoke coming out of your ears now?</p>
<p>(The swiss cheese analogy is courtesy of <a href="http://www.columbia.edu/cu/physics/fac-bios/Greene/faculty.html">Brian Greene</a> from a <a href="http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/">Radiolab</a> episode from 2008. Go ahead, let your mind be further blown and listen to <a href="http://blogs.wnyc.org/radiolab/2008/08/12/the-multi-universes/">the whole thing</a>.)</p>
<p>In today’s edition of <em>Physics Letters B</em>, theoretical physicist <a href="http://www.physics.indiana.edu/%7Enipoplaw/">Nikodem Poplawski</a> of Indiana University <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6TVN-4YK7J05-3&amp;_user=9132290&amp;_coverDate=04%2F12%2F2010&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=high&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;_docanchor=&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000056812&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=9132290&amp;md5=327c0f48e4b8de5a1f19b4">suggests</a> that our universe could be located within the interior of a wormhole which itself is part of a black hole that lies within a much larger universe.</p>
<p>Huh?</p>
<p>A wormhole is a shortcut through spacetime (and also what Jodie Foster travels through near the end of the movie <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contact_%28film%29"><em>Contact</em></a>). So <a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2010/04/07/is-our-universe-inside-another-larger-universe/"><em>Universe Today</em></a><em> </em>puts it this way, “A wormhole is a hypothetical ‘tunnel’ connecting two different points in spacetime, and in theory, at each end of the wormhole there could be two universes.”</p>
<p>One <a href="http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/04/wormhole-research-suggests-that.html">headline</a> about this research compares these universes to Russian nesting dolls. The paper suggests that all black holes may have wormholes, each with a new universe inside that formed simultaneously with the black hole. According to Poplawski, “From that it follows that our universe could have itself formed from inside a black hole existing inside another universe.”</p>
<p>Got it?</p>
<p>It’s very a cool, mind-blowing theory. And the trick with any multiverse theory, according to a great <em>New Scientist </em><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527501.100-a-measure-for-the-multiverse.html">article</a> last month, is that while it may be probable, it is essentially <em>untestable</em>. Unless you pull a Jodie Foster and travel through the wormhole yourself. Bon voyage.</p>
<p><em>Creative Commons image by AllenMcC</em></p>
<img width="110" height="62" src="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/624px-LorentzianWormhole-110x62.jpg" class="attachment-110x62 wp-post-image" alt="624px-LorentzianWormhole" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/a-universe-inside-a-universe/55901/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>